Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for synchronous express state machines #1

Closed
StevenDas-Tomo opened this issue Jan 22, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Support for synchronous express state machines #1

StevenDas-Tomo opened this issue Jan 22, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@StevenDas-Tomo
Copy link

Hi all,

The SFN CreateStateMachine API call has a "type" parameter for explicitly tagging a state machine as either standard or express:

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/step-functions/latest/apireference/API_CreateStateMachine.html

https://boto3.amazonaws.com/v1/documentation/api/latest/reference/services/stepfunctions.html#SFN.Client.create_state_machine

As far as I can tell, however, this Terraform module doesn't offer any way to specify the "type" of a state machine.

Are there any plans to add support for the "type" parameter? Or is this already possible today, and if so, how?

Our team is thinking of using a mix of standard and express state machines, so it would be useful to have the ability to customize this.

Thanks!

@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

Hi Steven,

There is an open issue in Terraform AWS provider about this - hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#11348

https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/blob/master/ROADMAP.md - here it says that it will be taken into account in the near future. Once done we can have support for this in the module.

@StevenDas-Tomo
Copy link
Author

Thanks, @antonbabenko!

@cojmcc
Copy link
Contributor

cojmcc commented Feb 10, 2021

I created a PR for this if you'd like to use the changes

@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

Yes, I will review and merge this later this week. Thanks @cojmcc !

@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

Please use v1.1.0 which has been just released.

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 28, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants