You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Try to add link by running: tmt link names beaker --link https://issues.redhat.com
nothing happens.
It looks like there is at least one issue:
1.we need to change this line to for link in links.get("relates"):
because links are tmt.base.Links whose default relation is "relates"
2.After I made that change, and run the command,it looks like work well,but after I look into my plan,I found the comment in
the plan is removed:
summary: Basic smoke test
provision:
how: beaker
kickstart:
script: |
lang en_US.UTF-8
zerombr
clearpart --all --initlabel
part /boot --fstype="ext4" --size=200
part / --fstype="btrfs" --size=10000 --grow
metadata:
# we need this
no_autopart
execute:
- script: touch /tmp/lili
vs
summary: Basic smoke test
provision:
how: beaker
kickstart:
script: |
lang en_US.UTF-8
zerombr
clearpart --all --initlabel
part /boot --fstype="ext4" --size=200
part / --fstype="btrfs" --size=10000 --grow
metadata: no_autopart
execute:
- script: touch /tmp/lili
link:
- relates: https://issues.redhat.com
I'm not sure this is wanted behavior,IMO,it is very common that we leave some comments in testcases, for others' convenience,
and we may also forget why a specific line is needed.
Just to be clear, this issue has nothing to do with #3339
It's just that I found this while testing that mr, and fvagner-config behaves the same(last run, link) as main branch,just as its comment claims:)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Try to add link by running:
tmt link names beaker --link https://issues.redhat.com
nothing happens.
It looks like there is at least one issue:
1.we need to change this line to
for link in links.get("relates"):
because links are tmt.base.Links whose default relation is "relates"
2.After I made that change, and run the command,it looks like work well,but after I look into my plan,I found the comment in
the plan is removed:
vs
I'm not sure this is wanted behavior,IMO,it is very common that we leave some comments in testcases, for others' convenience,
and we may also forget why a specific line is needed.
Just to be clear, this issue has nothing to do with #3339
It's just that I found this while testing that mr, and fvagner-config behaves the same(last run, link) as main branch,just as its comment claims:)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: