-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
Re-assess GeoOrigin terms for inclusion in first draft #425
Comments
For discussion at the next WG session (10-11-22): #137 islandGroup |
See #141 and #142 - use political divisions instead of baking in actual ranks to the term names. This lets the hierarchy grow without restriction and can be used in tandem with a rank field to allow the use of broader vocabularies. -- politicalDivision0 -> continent |
Better late than never ... On Tab "Registry_openDA_collection" of the "Registry_Vocabularies" spreadsheet file you can find the "Geographic region" schema from the SYNTHESYS+ report (Tilley 2019) for the Collection Digitization Dashboard. As a first guess, |
Partially addressed by PR #428, but I'm leaving it open until someone reminds me whether ecoRegion (#225) is included or not - the ecoRegion term-level issue isn't tagged with 'done' so it might need another look. Will break out the renaming of stateProvince and county as flagged by @rondlg into another issue and make any ensuing changes separately to keep things simpler and easier to trace. |
Working Group decision following discussion: Include ecoRegion in first draft, see notes from 30/11/2022 |
I would think that Countries and States would be more useful than continent in a collection description (especially for those that are more specific than "global"). I'm surprised they are not options under this class.
Originally posted by @Jegelewicz in #131 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: