Future Proofing (concept) for other versions?

[jasonwilliams]

I understand and agree with the default version being v4.
But should there be a section which outlines how this API would look if we needed to add an additional version to the spec?

This is just to avoid painting yourself into a corner.

[bakkot]

There's some discussion of this in #3.

[ctavan]

Since there's substantial discussion on precisely this topic going on in #3 I will close this issue. Let's continue the discussion in #3.

Edit: And yes, I totally agree @jasonwilliams that this needs to be outlined in the proposal! So thanks for raising this again and feel free to join the discussion in the other issue.

[bcoe]

@jasonwilliams, this topic is very much on our minds, excited to hear any further thoughts you have.

[jasonwilliams]

Ok thanks all, will take a look at #3 sorry I missed it.