Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 25, 2022. It is now read-only.

Worker Priority Hinting? #97

Closed
taisel opened this issue Mar 31, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Worker Priority Hinting? #97

taisel opened this issue Mar 31, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@taisel
Copy link

taisel commented Mar 31, 2016

It seems fit to provide a developer with ways to control resource contention among multiple workers. That being said, it's clear to me the priority level setting should be restricted against valid ranges in relation to main thread. It's also my understanding that Audio Workers are the exception to this restriction, to avoid latency issues (Or was that solved another way?).

This needs to be hashed out heavily, even if not incorporated into the SHM+Atomics specification directly.

Should we discuss this or leave it for another time?

@lars-t-hansen
Copy link
Collaborator

Try the HTML group. I have on my plate to move a bunch of issues I filed in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29039 to github, see discussion (also about hinting) on whatwg/html#851. You would probably want to reference the first one of those at least if you do file something.

@taisel
Copy link
Author

taisel commented Mar 31, 2016

Oh nice, didn't realize it got rolled up into that spec.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants