Grammar ambiguity in for ( async of
#2034
Labels
has consensus
This has committee consensus.
Comments
|
why allow keyword like |
|
Because they’ve always been allowed, and it wouldn’t be web compatible to disallow them now. |
pull bot
pushed a commit
to ashu8912/v8
that referenced
this issue
Feb 10, 2021
Implements tc39/ecma262#2034 Currently the token sequence `for (async of` is ambiguous. It can be the prefix for either `(async of => {};;);` or `for (async of foo);`. This CL disallows the token sequence. Note that `for await (async of` is still allowed, since there is no C-style `for await (;;)`, and thus no ambiguity. Bug: v8:11412 Change-Id: I3fede83a69420996baa2bc8b6c1cff000535d990 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2683221 Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <[email protected]> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72607}
|
For reference, the following code prints var async;
for (async of [42]) {}
console.log(async); |
strager
added a commit
to quick-lint/quick-lint-js
that referenced
this issue
Feb 19, 2021
For a while, the code 'for (async of []);' is ambiguous in the JS
standard. It's going to be made unambiguously a SyntaxError. Make
quick-lint-js report an error for this code, treating 'async' as a
variable name, and gracefully continue.
Many other forms, such as 'for (async.prop of []);' and
'for (async of => {}; cond; update);' are unambiguous, and shouldn't
result in any errors. This commit adds tests for these similar cases.
Discussion on the ambiguity and its resolution:
tc39/ecma262#2034
strager
added a commit
to quick-lint/quick-lint-js
that referenced
this issue
Feb 20, 2021
For a while, the code 'for (async of []);' is ambiguous in the JS
standard. It's going to be made unambiguously a SyntaxError. Make
quick-lint-js report an error for this code, treating 'async' as a
variable name, and gracefully continue.
Many other forms, such as 'for (async.prop of []);' and
'for (async of => {}; cond; update);' are unambiguous, and shouldn't
result in any errors. This commit adds tests for these similar cases.
Discussion on the ambiguity and its resolution:
tc39/ecma262#2034
strager
added a commit
to quick-lint/quick-lint-js
that referenced
this issue
Feb 20, 2021
For a while, the code 'for (async of []);' is ambiguous in the JS
standard. It's going to be made unambiguously a SyntaxError. Make
quick-lint-js report an error for this code, treating 'async' as a
variable name, and gracefully continue.
Many other forms, such as 'for (async.prop of []);' and
'for (async of => {}; cond; update);' are unambiguous, and shouldn't
result in any errors. This commit adds tests for these similar cases.
Discussion on the ambiguity and its resolution:
tc39/ecma262#2034
|
@strager A fix was recently merged (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2683221), and Chrome 90 / V8 9.0 will correctly disallow |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The token sequence
for ( async ofcan begin two different parses: eitherfor (async of => {};;);orfor (async of foo);.@waldemarhorwat raised this issue at the December 2019 meeting. During that discussion we decided to resolve this by using a lookahead restriction to disallow for-of loops which start with the token
async.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: