Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Hide irrelevant branches #37

Open
taneliang opened this issue Aug 3, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Hide irrelevant branches #37

taneliang opened this issue Aug 3, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
domain: SourceControl importance: 1 - must have Must be implemented for the product to be complete urgency: 1 - soon work type: implementation A task that primarily involves bashing code
Milestone
Launch

Comments

@taneliang
Copy link
Owner

taneliang commented Aug 3, 2020 •
edited
Loading

As discussed in a 8:30pm SGT call with @saphal1998.

In our command line UI, show these branch types:

  • Local long lived branches
  • Remote long lived branches
  • Local feature branches
  • Remote feature branches that do not have local branches tracking them (so that we can still rebase on top of others' work) let's just hide these as well for simplicity; users can just create a new local branch if they want to rebase onto someone elses' work.
@taneliang taneliang added this to the Launch milestone Aug 15, 2020
@taneliang taneliang added importance: 1 - must have Must be implemented for the product to be complete urgency: 2 - we can wait domain: SourceControl work type: implementation A task that primarily involves bashing code urgency: 1 - soon and removed urgency: 2 - we can wait labels Aug 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
domain: SourceControl importance: 1 - must have Must be implemented for the product to be complete urgency: 1 - soon work type: implementation A task that primarily involves bashing code
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Launch
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@taneliang