feat(addon-doc): support target property for links

[splincode]

No description provided.

[lumberjack-bot]

Pull request was closed ✔️

All saved screenshots (for current PR) were deleted 🗑️

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (v3.x@f8607a1). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             v3.x    #6876   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   60.58%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       90           
  Lines           ?      987           
  Branches        ?      103           
=======================================
  Hits            ?      598           
  Misses          ?      370           
  Partials        ?       19           

Flag	Coverage Δ
addon-charts	∅ <ø> (?)
addon-doc	60.58% <ø> (?)
summary	60.58% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit cb752fc):

https://taiga-ui--pr6876-splincode-fix-doc-5f1tcyne.web.app

_{(expires Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:02:22 GMT)}

_{🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎}

_{Sign: 4b5ece1e114386f6a105425ef799091475b249eb}

[bundlemon]

BundleMon

Files updated (2)

Status	Path	Size	Limits
✅	demo/browser/main.(hash).js	386.08KB (+1.42KB +0.37%)	+10%
✅	demo/browser/runtime.(hash).js	40.75KB (+105B +0.25%)	+10%

Unchanged files (3)

Status	Path	Size	Limits
✅	demo/browser/vendor.(hash).js	213.01KB	+10%
✅	demo/browser/polyfills.(hash).js	11.25KB	+10%
✅	demo/browser/styles.(hash).css	1.39KB	+10%

Total files change +1.52KB +0.23%

Groups updated (1)

Status	Path	Size	Limits
✅	demo/browser/*..js	2.37MB (+10.86KB +0.45%)	-

Final result: ✅

View report in BundleMon website ➡️

---

Current branch size history | Target branch size history

[waterplea]

I think that's excessive. Can we just add rel="noreferrer noopener" there? What's the potential downside?