From b923091e54f4c2ed6b4e9248f95cc357f5972646 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: tkb-github <130416721+tkb-github@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 18:13:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Update=20extra=E2=80=90stemmatic.md?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
---
"docs/extra\342\200\220stemmatic.md" | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git "a/docs/extra\342\200\220stemmatic.md" "b/docs/extra\342\200\220stemmatic.md"
index 80cbd6d2..65c8defa 100644
--- "a/docs/extra\342\200\220stemmatic.md"
+++ "b/docs/extra\342\200\220stemmatic.md"
@@ -9,16 +9,17 @@ description: Recentiores, non deteriores
---
# Extra‐stemmatic Readings
-Recentiores, non deteriores.
-—Pasquali
+Recentiores, non deteriores.
+
+
—Pasquali
-… if an authentic reading could survive once in this way in a single not very early copy, it might do so elsewhere. Clearly it will not do to ascribe any inherently plausible reading found only in late MSS to ‘conjecture’ without first considering when and under what circumstances the postulated emendator may reasonably be imagined to have worked – which is a historical question.
-—E. J. Kenney
+… if an authentic reading could survive once in this way
in a single not very early copy, it might do so elsewhere.
Clearly it will not do to ascribe any inherently plausible
reading found only in late MSS to ‘conjecture’ without
first considering when and under what circumstances
the postulated emendator may reasonably be imagined
to have worked – which is a historical question.
+
—E. J. Kenney
-A propensity to emendation, so far from discrediting a manuscript, may be symptomatic of an interest in the text that also prompted the consultation of out-of-the-way copies.
-—M. L. West
+A propensity to emendation, so far from
discrediting a manuscript, may be
symptomatic of an interest in the text
that also prompted the consultation
of out-of-the-way copies.
+
—M. L. West
## Lucan.