Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf(es/typescript): Add a benchmark for fast TS strip #9205

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

kdy1
Copy link
Member

@kdy1 kdy1 commented Jul 11, 2024

No description provided.

@kdy1 kdy1 added this to the Planned milestone Jul 11, 2024
@kdy1 kdy1 self-assigned this Jul 11, 2024
@kdy1 kdy1 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 11, 2024 09:16
kodiakhq[bot]
kodiakhq bot previously approved these changes Jul 11, 2024
Copy link
Member Author

@kdy1 kdy1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

swc-bump:

  • dbg-swc

@kdy1 kdy1 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 11, 2024 09:17
@kdy1 kdy1 disabled auto-merge July 11, 2024 09:18
@kdy1 kdy1 merged commit 7d9364c into swc-project:main Jul 11, 2024
5 checks passed
@kdy1 kdy1 deleted the bench-fast branch July 11, 2024 09:22
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jul 11, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #9205 will degrade performances by 6.72%

Comparing kdy1:bench-fast (e62a3fd) with kdy1:bench-fast (bf91d77)

Summary

⚡ 3 improvements
❌ 1 regressions
✅ 169 untouched benchmarks

🆕 1 new benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark kdy1:bench-fast kdy1:bench-fast Change
es/full/bugs-1 669.3 µs 590.9 µs +13.28%
es/full/base/fixer 133.2 µs 142.8 µs -6.72%
es/full/base/resolver_and_hygiene 515.2 µs 329.2 µs +56.48%
es/full/parser 1.7 ms 1.6 ms +3.19%
🆕 typescript/fast-strip N/A 750.6 µs N/A

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant