-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move discussions to Github #5873
Comments
It's been asked on GitHub as well. #5857 |
Oops! I didn't find that one. It's good to know the frustration is shared. |
I fully appreciate the issue with time and resources to moderate such a thing, but I think this is a serious issue that needs addressing. I would love to move to svelte and was even interested in helping out, but I've been completely put off by the lack of a sensible discussion forum. At the very least you should point people to stackoverflow instead of discord. Using discord for this is a joke - you can't have a sensible technical discussion on a chat system. |
To Point 6: You can link GitHub and Discord account. I think both (Discord, GH-Discussions) are having their special pros and cons. At the end of the day i would prefer using both platforms because i think so you can get the best of both. |
Repeating questions are the worst on discord, but I think discord is maybe still cool for "realtime" support? |
If I may add, for us at tldr-pages a great solution to this problem has been to use Gitter, which solves these issues quite nicely IMO:
And best of all, it's open source! |
Svelte used to use Gitter, and we moved away to discord. I don't know the reasons behind it, but there were probably things which we didn't like about it. Gitter has had a dramatic decrease in usage since its inception, which doesn't seem to correlate with it being a good solution. |
Closing this as I think gh discussions are out of the question. If there were to be a new issue to discuss this problem, I would like to see it pitched as more "a way to retain persistent questions and answers" vs "use product B". |
That issue title again reads "Move most discussions to Product B". |
It takes significantly more time to re-answer questions 10 times on discord (which I'm doing too, sometimes). Then maybe the title should be adjusted to read more like "Re-answering is annoying" and the first comment could be "I think Github Discussions is good against this problem, here's why:". |
A good bunch of the problems I pointed out while opening this issue are issues that do not necessarily come from being on Discord, but from NOT being on Github. I was soliciting for having all things in one place, and all the benefits that come from it. That said, I understand where @antony is coming from. I'm stepping back from this one and inviting anyone else to take move the issue forward, with a non-Github-Discussions solution to "the Discord problem". |
I write gists if I need to answer something a lot. Gists, presentations, talks, and example apps. You are correct in that the title should be "Re-answering is annoying" - that's exactly what I mean by presenting with a problem, not a solution :) |
Github Discussions is currently in public beta. Has there been any discussion about moving "community support" from Discord to Discussions?
Reasons for using Discussions:
We lose a lot of community knowledge through Discord.
Once a question has been asked and answered, it is buried in a stream of new messages never to be found again. With discussions, you can easily browse previous discussions, and conversations are discoverable through Google.
Upvoting, comments and reactions make it easy to discover interesting info on Discussions.
Not everyone uses Discord.
For example, I only use discord for Svelte. This means I only visit the channel by accident or if I'm really stuck on a problem. I assume I'm not the only one.
Many issues and feature requests etc. are lost
Search for issues(and comments) mentioning Discord on Github. I assume there are a lot more issues than the 34 that were discussed on Discord but no one reported here.
Also, links to the conversation on Discord are especially rare due to how Discord's stream-of-consciousness conversations work. Using a Discord conversation to move an Issue forward is unnecessarily difficult.
People still use Github Issues to ask for help anyway.
Converting an issue into a Discussion is trivial. But it stays as an issue if we use Discord, thus adding noise to actual issues that serve as a roadmap of sorts.
Addressing issues on Discord is difficult
People are asking questions/sharing info over each other, making it difficult to respond to other's messages. If no one responds to you in a few minutes, it's likely no one ever will. Github Discussions separates every question/conversation/showcase separately making sure everyone's is addressed.
People may use different identities on Discord
It's difficult to @mention someone relevant to a conversation unless they're using the same Github username on Discord, so you don't know if it's really them.
I have 42.7 more reasons, but I'll spare you the pain.
Case in point: it's possible this question has been asked on Discord, but I don't know where to find the said discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: