Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Epic: support encryption-less connections between clusters #674

Closed
7 tasks done
skitt opened this issue Jun 23, 2020 · 8 comments
Closed
7 tasks done

Epic: support encryption-less connections between clusters #674

skitt opened this issue Jun 23, 2020 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority:high size:large This needs more than one sprint to be implemented vxlan

Comments

@skitt
Copy link
Member

skitt commented Jun 23, 2020

What would you like to be added:

Support for unencrypted connections between clusters.

Why is this needed:

All current cable drivers involve encrypting content, which is great for privacy but involves some overhead. On private connections, it would be useful to enable unencrypted connections, for example using IP-on-IP or VxLAN.

Work items:

@nyechiel
Copy link
Member

nyechiel commented Sep 8, 2020

Per further discussion, IPsec VPN without encryption is also a good option we should consider. This boils down to supporting different config options per cable driver which is a subset of submariner-io/enhancements#67

@nyechiel
Copy link
Member

nyechiel commented Sep 9, 2020

Per conversation with Paul Wouters (Libreswan maintainer), these are some options to consider:

  1. Null encryption mode: https://github.com/libreswan/libreswan/tree/main/testing/pluto/ikev2-67-esp-null-iperf
  2. Null encryption and null authentication mode: https://github.com/libreswan/libreswan/tree/main/testing/pluto/ikev2-algo-15-esp-null-none

Generally, with modern NICs/CPUs, setting ESP to null is not recommend; aes_gcm128 is the most efficient option, and should result in same throughput as esp-null. Here is the relevant GCM RFC for more context: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4106

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 8, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please make a comment if this issue/pr is still valid. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Nov 8, 2020
@nyechiel
Copy link
Member

nyechiel commented Nov 8, 2020

bump

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label Nov 8, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 7, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please make a comment if this issue/pr is still valid. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jan 7, 2021
@skitt
Copy link
Member Author

skitt commented Jan 7, 2021

This is still relevant.

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jan 7, 2021
@nyechiel nyechiel changed the title Support encryption-less connections between clusters Epic: support encryption-less connections between clusters Feb 17, 2021
@nyechiel nyechiel added the vxlan label Feb 17, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented May 1, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Please make a comment if this issue/pr is still valid. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label May 1, 2021
@tpantelis
Copy link
Contributor

bump

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label May 1, 2021
@nyechiel nyechiel added priority:high size:large This needs more than one sprint to be implemented labels May 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority:high size:large This needs more than one sprint to be implemented vxlan
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants