Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create yeoman template/generator for loopback-next #361

Closed
kjdelisle opened this issue Jun 9, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Create yeoman template/generator for loopback-next #361

kjdelisle opened this issue Jun 9, 2017 · 6 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@kjdelisle
Copy link
Contributor

kjdelisle commented Jun 9, 2017

Even though parts of loopback-next are still in flux, I think it would be a good idea to begin building up a generator to rapidly spin up apps, rather than relying on the example as a template to bootstrap our own work.

This would be a good opportunity to properly dogfood the generator ourselves, as well as the design.

Questions

  • Do we have a "best practice" or default we'd like to follow for how the generated applications organize their resources? (Will we mimic [email protected]?)
  • Would we want to change generator-loopback to accept command line arguments/environment variables? (Useful for automated testing)
  • Would we create a new template rather than use the existing one?

Considerations

@kjdelisle kjdelisle self-assigned this Jun 9, 2017
@kjdelisle
Copy link
Contributor Author

@superkhau
Copy link
Contributor

@kjdelisle I've been discussing some of the CLI experience with @ritch for things that should happen soon, so +1 from me. However, I'm not sure if this should happen in the current generator/yeoman, etc.

@bajtos
Copy link
Member

bajtos commented Jun 21, 2017

My opinion:

Another thing to consider: integration with APIC Editor, possibly via loopback-workspace.

@kjdelisle kjdelisle changed the title Create yeoman template for loopback-next Create yeoman template/generator for loopback-next Jun 27, 2017
@dhmlau
Copy link
Member

dhmlau commented Aug 15, 2017

@kjdelisle, looks like we might need a spike to see what are the Yeoman equivalent we could possibly use for interactive command line user interfaces. Are you ok to change this as a spike?

@bajtos mentioned Inquirer in strongloop/generator-loopback#139.

cc @rashmihunt

@dhmlau
Copy link
Member

dhmlau commented Nov 3, 2017

duplicate of #697 ?

@kjdelisle
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kjdelisle kjdelisle added this to the Sprint 48 milestone Nov 14, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants