You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Do not suggest measuring the width of roads with foot=no.
I'm not sure if this is a good idea for other countries, but according to the classification of roads in Russia, highway =primary/secondary in cities these are large roads, so it is dangerous and usually forbidden for pedestrians to go out on them. Outside of populated areas, sections of such roads are usually long, and it is useless to know their width.
Versions affected
56.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Some of these seem to be connectors, which are not really roads in that sense but just exist for connectivity. But I don't think it is possible to filter these out.
Some of these seem to be connectors, which are not really roads in that sense but just exist for connectivity. But I don't think it is possible to filter these out.
This sounds like footway=link (and cycleway=link) which is an "in use" tag to segment (routing) connectivity road segments that to not have a real world representation.
How to Reproduce
Here StreetComplete asked for the width of the road with the tags
highway=primary
,foot=no
:Panoramas
Here
highway=secondary
,foot=no
Panoramas
Here
highway=secondary
Panoramas
Expected Behavior
Do not suggest measuring the width of roads with
foot=no
.I'm not sure if this is a good idea for other countries, but according to the classification of roads in Russia,
highway =primary/secondary
in cities these are large roads, so it is dangerous and usually forbidden for pedestrians to go out on them. Outside of populated areas, sections of such roads are usually long, and it is useless to know their width.Versions affected
56.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: