Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prevent huge area uploads #4245

Closed
SafetyIng opened this issue Jul 27, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed

Prevent huge area uploads #4245

SafetyIng opened this issue Jul 27, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@SafetyIng
Copy link

Streetcomplete generates massively huge changesets (geographical expansion), so that urgent countermeasures must be taken here. It massively complicates the QM of OSM. Especially such large areas should be avoided. Examples can be found in the following CS:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124041687
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124047734

@SafetyIng SafetyIng added the bug label Jul 27, 2022
@matkoniecz
Copy link
Member

matkoniecz commented Jul 27, 2022

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F

It is not covering your answer, please explain why. And confirm that problem is not caused by user error.

@SafetyIng
Copy link
Author

And confirm that problem is not caused by user error.

Sorry, that is a problem, that SC has to handle, if their users missuse the software. I don't write to all users now. SC has to handle big areas! And really: I don't care, how. But when an option of your system makes a problem wich is anounced so much often, then you should handle it ;)

@matkoniecz
Copy link
Member

matkoniecz commented Jul 27, 2022

that SC has to handle, if their users missuse the software

Not really. Any OSM editor can be misused in ways not preventable in feasible ways.

It would make sense to do something only if it is typically happening due to edits which are not invalid or wrong.

Making wrong edits more visible for reviewers is a good thing.

@SafetyIng
Copy link
Author

Making wrong edits more visible for reviewers is a good thing.

Only when it is able to find this edits. When I get 100 edits in a area and 50 are not really in this area, because SC has so big bboxes created, so this edits show up in my search area; then this is a problem.

@BalooUriza
Copy link

BalooUriza commented Jul 27, 2022 via email

@SafetyIng
Copy link
Author

with the user you're having trouble with, and ask that they upload their StreetComplete changes before moving a large distance away

When Streetcomplete would have a maximum bbox or other options to prevent this happening, than you don't need to get intouch with other users. Technical solutions are always preferable to a level 3 solution (personal behaviour).

@matkoniecz
Copy link
Member

matkoniecz commented Jul 27, 2022

It would make sense to do something only if it is typically happening due to edits which are not invalid or wrong.

If large bbox happen due to user "mapping" places which they have not visited then it is misuse of SC.

If there is indicator that large (most?) of large bboxes is caused by people mapping places they visited then some action from SC side may make sense. Until it happens: see FAQ.

If and only if such indicator will happen (based on say review of say continuous list of 100 very large bboxes made by SC mappers) then new issue should be opened.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants