-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 364
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add skybridges/skyways as an option to the building quest #2630
Comments
Note that it is contentless bot-generated data item page. If there is no entry on OSM Wiki then taginfo entry is far more useful (in this case: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=building&value=skyway ) |
I'd say that this building type (if you can say that it is a building) is far too rare to be in that list. Better leave a note in that case. |
Okay so I didn't find the right tag at first But I checked again and it seems that instead of skyway building=bridge is used This one got 1.5k uses |
I also think |
Given we have "Pagoda" in the "Religious Buildings" area, which has less than 150 uses in the map, I'd also say, that adding Again, in my urban area there are plentyful where that'll apply: That would be my solution that I can PR any time, given @westnordost would accept it. |
Oh, that's the meaning of |
Anyway, the icon looks good. Since you seem to already have implemented it, care to create a PR to include it? |
Done. Included a German translation (as per my testing), if you want this to be done with POEdit, you can remove the file from the branch as I allowed edits from maintainers. |
Use case
Enable mapping of such structures
(I mean those enclosed skyways which have a roof and walls like
http://correctionalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/SonomaCounty-800x445.jpg
Or
https://placesjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/yoos-james-multilevel-metropolis-15.jpg
Proposed Solution
Ideally add a tag for those kinds of structures
Sadly it's a bit unclear how to tag them but I found this
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q16636
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: