Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Separate mouse click settings for permanent and temporary containers #482

Open
rawlife56 opened this issue Dec 27, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@rawlife56
Copy link

First of all, thank you for this great add-on.

I would like to request an option to separate mouse click settings in isolation for permanent and temporary containers.

Use case-

  1. I'm logged into Twitter and Github in the 'work' container.

(First party isolation is switched on and hence I need not worry about cross site tracking in a single container)
Hence I turned on automatic mode but turned off all isolation with mouse clicks.
So that, I won't create unnecessary temp containers on every click which is taken care by first party isolation.

Here's the case,
Someone posts a link to a tweet in github and I click on it. With the above settings, the link always opens in the same container where twitter is logged in but I want it to open in a temp container with the left click. Setting the left click to always isolate will also apply in temp containers which creates unnecessary temp containers on every click.

Here's what I want to set to make it behave like i want-

Isolation with mouse clicks in permanent containers-
Middle click - Never
Ctrl + left click - always
Left click - if different from Domain/Sub domans

Isolation with mouse clicks in temporary containers-
Middle click - Never
Ctrl + left click - always
Left click - Never

What you can do- Offer a single option to separate isolation settings for temporary and permanent containers
When toggled on - the isolation settings page will have an extra tab to configure each of them separately at least for mouse clicks.

Hope I made sense and looking forward for the discussion.

@stoically
Copy link
Owner

Sounds like a useful feature. Would fit into the scope of #397

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants