Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed connect under reset for st-flash and st-util #983

Merged

Conversation

adrienbruant
Copy link

I've added support for the connect under reset feature on st-util and st-flash. This feature was added in a previous pull request (#963) but there was a missing connection between the CLI and the library.

@Nightwalker-87
Copy link
Member

Nightwalker-87 commented Jun 15, 2020

@adrienbruant: That's very attentive - Thank you. 👍

@Nightwalker-87 Nightwalker-87 changed the title Add connect under reset for st-flash and st-util [bugfix] Connect under reset for st-flash and st-util Jun 15, 2020
@adrienbruant
Copy link
Author

@Nightwalker-87 Sorry, are you asking me to review these issues ? I'm afraid I don't have time and my understanding of stlink is superficial. I saw a quick fix for something that was bugging me, but I can't offer much more. That's my first PR ever on a public project, sorry if it's not proper etiquette.

@Nightwalker-87
Copy link
Member

Nightwalker-87 commented Jun 15, 2020

No, you are fine with that and only assigned to this PR as you are the author.

@Nightwalker-87 Nightwalker-87 changed the base branch from develop to connect_under_reset June 17, 2020 11:34
@Nightwalker-87 Nightwalker-87 merged commit 3b520df into stlink-org:connect_under_reset Jun 17, 2020
@stlink-org stlink-org locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 29, 2020
@Nightwalker-87 Nightwalker-87 changed the title [bugfix] Connect under reset for st-flash and st-util Fixed connect under reset for st-flash and st-util Jul 17, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants