-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[compatibility] libusb-1.0 replaced by libusbx in most distros #211
Comments
I've just read the link you posted and noticed this on the libusbx project page:
New project site: http://libusb.info |
That what I get for operating from memory. I expect that we will be seeing libusbx for most distros for at least the next 6mo. In the most recent Fedora for instance you have: libusb.x86_64 1:0.1.5-2.fc20 There was a libusb1 package that was replaced by the libusbx in F18. I don't have a strong opinion on this just thought I would make the note as I was going through and rebuilding some of my dev tools on a new box. |
Probably this is no longer relevant. Reopen when issue stil remains. |
Closes stlink-org#211 stlink-org#782. See also stlink-org#733.
Closes stlink-org#211 stlink-org#782. See also stlink-org#733.
Closes stlink-org#211 stlink-org#782. See also stlink-org#733.
On many new distros libusb-1.0 has been replaced by the maintained libusbx. As far as stlink is concerned they are drop in compatible, but this might want to be reflected in the readme.
http://libusb.6.n5.nabble.com/libusb-is-dead-long-live-libusbx-td5651413.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: