You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for the very nice package. I am working with large scale single cell RNA seq data and wnat to use tidySingleCellExperiment.
I discovered that aggregate_cells takes very long, as compared to aggregateAcrossCells.
Hello @MaximilianNuber , yes, we plan to identify and solve these efficiency issues. We will start soon with dedicated people on it, but feel free to propose a PR, that would help a lot.
Dear Dr. Mangiola,
Thank you for the very nice package. I am working with large scale single cell RNA seq data and wnat to use tidySingleCellExperiment.
I discovered that
aggregate_cells
takes very long, as compared toaggregateAcrossCells
.As I am usually working on a server, I recreated the problem with a 225k cell dataset on my laptop:
https://cellxgene.cziscience.com/e/dea717d4-7bc0-4e46-950f-fd7e1cc8df7d.cxg/
aggregateAcrossCells
runs fast:This code ran very long and I interrupted after about 10 minutes.
I looked at this with Michael Love, and we found this may be an issue with the combination of donor and cell type.
This code took just a few seconds:
Thank you for any help!
output of sessionInfo:
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: