Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

txnbuild: Reinstate missing fee bump transaction functions #3199

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 11, 2020

Conversation

tamirms
Copy link
Contributor

@tamirms tamirms commented Nov 6, 2020

PR Checklist

PR Structure

  • This PR has reasonably narrow scope (if not, break it down into smaller PRs).
  • This PR avoids mixing refactoring changes with feature changes (split into two PRs
    otherwise).
  • This PR's title starts with name of package that is most changed in the PR, ex.
    services/friendbot, or all or doc if the changes are broad or impact many
    packages.

Thoroughness

  • This PR adds tests for the most critical parts of the new functionality or fixes.
  • I've updated any docs (developer docs, .md
    files, etc... affected by this change). Take a look in the docs folder for a given service,
    like this one.

Release planning

  • I've updated the relevant CHANGELOG (here for Horizon) if
    needed with deprecations, added features, breaking changes, and DB schema changes.
  • I've decided if this PR requires a new major/minor version according to
    semver, or if it's mainly a patch change. The PR is targeted at the next
    release branch if it's not a patch change.

What

A few functions on the fee bump transaction struct were unintentionally removed in https://github.com/stellar/go/pull/3048/files

This commit reinstates those deleted functions and adds tests for the functions to prevent them from being deleted accidentally again.

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla: yes label Nov 6, 2020
@tamirms tamirms requested a review from a team November 6, 2020 17:00
@tamirms tamirms force-pushed the feebump-txnbuild-fix branch from fdbb1d5 to 50efba2 Compare November 6, 2020 17:06
Copy link
Contributor

@marcelosalloum marcelosalloum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

txnbuild/fee_bump_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +496 to +498
newTx := new(FeeBumpTransaction)
*newTx = *t
newTx.signatures = extendedSignatures
Copy link
Contributor

@Shaptic Shaptic Nov 10, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know you're just reinstating missing functionality, but can I ask what this is doing? Is this like a Go-idiomatic way to copy a struct?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in Go the assignment operator copies by value. However, the assignment operator does a shallow copy. If you have any pointers or slices in your structs, the new struct will still have references to those fields. Here's an article which provides more details on this topic https://flaviocopes.com/go-copying-structs/

In this particular case, the signatures field is the only mutable field in the struct. There are no exported functions on FeeBumpTransaction or Transaction which modify any of the other fields in the struct. The code creates a copy of the FeeBumpTransaction struct via assignment and then it does a deep copy on the signatures slice.

@tamirms tamirms merged commit f80da5f into stellar:master Nov 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants