You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Remote captive core is currently publicized in our docs, but we do not maintain it or test it when we do releases. It has not kept up with feature development on main line (ex. on-disk mode), and we do not dogfood it ourselves so are unaware of any potential bugs or operational issues (ex. recent issue with metrics endpoint).
What would you like to see?
Remove the configuration options / env variables for it
Remove all functionality and codepaths associated with it
Remove any reference to it or mention of it in public-facing documentation
What alternatives are there?
Start maintaining + testing it so that we can confidently document and recommend it. I don't see this option being worthwhile as I find it unlikely anyone is actually using this option, and we don't have a solid use case for it internally
Don't remove it from code, just remove it from public-facing documentation. This could still achieve the goal of dissuading people from using it, but it would still be available if they were currently using it
Remove it from code, but leave mention of it (and it's deprecation) in public-facing documentation. This could be useful for anyone that was currently using it and give them a clear path as to how to migrate away from it
Don't remove it from code or documentation, but change the existing documentation disclaimer about it being experimental to make it clear that it is not maintained at all and to use at your own risk. This is probably the quickest and safest option that achieves the end goal
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I support (2), since it's still a useful piece of code (even if it needs some maintenance), because it already lives in the exp/ (as in experimental) folder which should imply that its usage is risky.
What problem does your feature solve?
Remote captive core is currently publicized in our docs, but we do not maintain it or test it when we do releases. It has not kept up with feature development on main line (ex. on-disk mode), and we do not dogfood it ourselves so are unaware of any potential bugs or operational issues (ex. recent issue with metrics endpoint).
What would you like to see?
What alternatives are there?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: