You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
1. Two Solo Stacker-Signers Stack Across Cycles
In this scenario, two solo stacker-signers Alice & Bob sign & stack for one tenure. Alice provides a signature; Bob uses ‘set-signer-key-authorization.’
Error Checks
Alice provides a mal-formed signature
Bob submits an mal-formed ‘set-signer-key-authorization’
Alice fails signature replay for the next record cycle
Bob fails signer-key-authorization replay for the next record cycle
2. Two Signers, Two Solo Stackers Across Cycles
In this scenario, two solo/service signers, Alice & Bob, provide verification for Carl & Dave, solo stackers. Alice provides a signature for Carl; Bob uses ‘set-signer-key-authorization’ to provide signature-less authority to Dave.
Error Checks
Alice tries duplicating voting for an aggregate public key
Bob tries changing the round by +2
Carl submits a period inconsistent w/ the signature provided by Alice
Dave submits a pox-addr inconsistent w/ the pox-addr found in Bob’s signature
3. Three Signers, Two Solo Stackers, One Stacking Pool Across A Tenure
In this scenario, two solo signer-stackers (Alice, Bob) & one service signer (Carl) provide signatures for one stacking pool controlled by David which has three (3) stackers inside (Eve, Frank, Grace).
Alice, Bob, & two pool stackers (Frank & Grace) successfully stack for the first cycle in Nakamoto with the aggregated public key voted upon by Carl & Dave.
Error Checks
Alice creates a signature with period > 12
Bob creates a signature with a reward cycle in the past
David tries delegate-stacking for Eve with a longer period than submitted
Alice tries stacking & delegating
David tries stacking with an incorrect topic
4. Two Solo Stacker-Signers Stack Across Multiple Reward Cycles
In this scenario, two solo stacker-signers Alice & Bob sign & stack for two cycles. Alice provides a signature for one cycle; Bob uses ‘set-signer-key-authorization’ for four cycles.
They both successfully stack & sign blocks with their aggregate public key for cycle one (1).
At the end of cycle one (1), Alice calls stack-extend & passes in her new key to extend by two cycles. Bob calls stack-increase to increase their amount stacked.
At the end of cycle 3 , the next reward cycle, however, should fail since there will be a single signer for cycle 4 (Bob).
Error Checks
Alice tries, in cycle 1, to vote with Bob's signer index
Bob tries, in cycle 2, to vote for the previous aggregate public key
Alice tries, in cycle 2, to stack-extend using a signature for Bob
Prepare phase ends with no aggregate public key set for the fourth reward cycle- chain should stall
**5. Two Signers, One Solo Stacker-Signer, Two Pool Operators, Six Pool Stackers Across Multiple Reward Cycles
**
In this scenario, two service signers (Alice, Bob), one stacker-signer (Carl), two stacking pool operators (Dave, Eve), & six pool stackers (Frank, Grace, Heidi, Ivan, Judy, Mallory).
First Nakamoto Reward Cycle
First Nakamoto Tenure
1.Franks stacks for 1 reward cycle, Grace stacks for 2 reward cycles & so on…Mallory stacks for 6 reward cycles: (so 6 wallets stacking n, n+1, n+2… cycles)
2. Dave asks Alice for 3 signatures
3. Eve asks Bob for 3 set-authorizations
4. Ivan - Mallory ask Bob to set-approval-authorization
5. Carl stx-stacks & self-signs for 2 reward cycle
Error Checks
Alice provides multiple different signatures with the same auth-id
Second Nakamoto Tenure
6. Dave aggregate-commits with Alice-provided signature
7. Eve aggregate-commits without signature (since provided authorization)
8. Carl ‘stacks-extend’ for another 2 reward cycles
Error Checks
Dave aggregate-commits twice with the same signature
Bob aggregate-commits for than the max-amount
First Nakamoto Cycle Prepare Phase (last 99 tenures / burnchain blocks)
9. Dave votes for aggregate public key
10. Eve votes for aggregate public key
12. Carl ‘stacks-increases’
Error Checks
Carl ‘stack-increases’ fails due to straddling to two signers key due to previous stack-extend
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Multiple User(s) Tests
1. Two Solo Stacker-Signers Stack Across Cycles
In this scenario, two solo stacker-signers Alice & Bob sign & stack for one tenure. Alice provides a signature; Bob uses ‘set-signer-key-authorization.’
Error Checks
2. Two Signers, Two Solo Stackers Across Cycles
In this scenario, two solo/service signers, Alice & Bob, provide verification for Carl & Dave, solo stackers. Alice provides a signature for Carl; Bob uses ‘set-signer-key-authorization’ to provide signature-less authority to Dave.
Error Checks
3. Three Signers, Two Solo Stackers, One Stacking Pool Across A Tenure
In this scenario, two solo signer-stackers (Alice, Bob) & one service signer (Carl) provide signatures for one stacking pool controlled by David which has three (3) stackers inside (Eve, Frank, Grace).
Alice, Bob, & two pool stackers (Frank & Grace) successfully stack for the first cycle in Nakamoto with the aggregated public key voted upon by Carl & Dave.
Error Checks
4. Two Solo Stacker-Signers Stack Across Multiple Reward Cycles
In this scenario, two solo stacker-signers Alice & Bob sign & stack for two cycles. Alice provides a signature for one cycle; Bob uses ‘set-signer-key-authorization’ for four cycles.
They both successfully stack & sign blocks with their aggregate public key for cycle one (1).
At the end of cycle one (1), Alice calls stack-extend & passes in her new key to extend by two cycles. Bob calls stack-increase to increase their amount stacked.
At the end of cycle 3 , the next reward cycle, however, should fail since there will be a single signer for cycle 4 (Bob).
Error Checks
**5. Two Signers, One Solo Stacker-Signer, Two Pool Operators, Six Pool Stackers Across Multiple Reward Cycles
**
In this scenario, two service signers (Alice, Bob), one stacker-signer (Carl), two stacking pool operators (Dave, Eve), & six pool stackers (Frank, Grace, Heidi, Ivan, Judy, Mallory).
First Nakamoto Reward Cycle
First Nakamoto Tenure
1.Franks stacks for 1 reward cycle, Grace stacks for 2 reward cycles & so on…Mallory stacks for 6 reward cycles: (so 6 wallets stacking n, n+1, n+2… cycles)
2. Dave asks Alice for 3 signatures
3. Eve asks Bob for 3 set-authorizations
4. Ivan - Mallory ask Bob to set-approval-authorization
5. Carl stx-stacks & self-signs for 2 reward cycle
Error Checks
Second Nakamoto Tenure
6. Dave aggregate-commits with Alice-provided signature
7. Eve aggregate-commits without signature (since provided authorization)
8. Carl ‘stacks-extend’ for another 2 reward cycles
Error Checks
First Nakamoto Cycle Prepare Phase (last 99 tenures / burnchain blocks)
9. Dave votes for aggregate public key
10. Eve votes for aggregate public key
12. Carl ‘stacks-increases’
Error Checks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: