-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Plugin chain issue #181
Comments
@ubosshivaditya can you explain the linked issues ? |
Certainly! The linked issues focus on improving how plugin-generated comments are managed within your repository to enhance clarity and maintainability. Here's a summary of each:
Common Theme Across Issues: If you have any specific questions about these issues or need further clarification on their implementations, feel free to ask! |
right now it's messy that every plugin posts their own comments. It allows for flexibility but I think it's a bad idea for it to be the main way.
I propose we have a method that lets the developer pass in the comments data and the kernel posts the comment on the behalf of the plugin.
Great example of a plugin comment that should be inside of the /start message.
I envision it can just append this below the /start table basically.
Make it so plugins can append if ran in a chain. This was discussed before by leveraging KV run ID in the metadata and such.
Originally posted by @ubiquity-os-betas in ubiquity-os-marketplace/text-conversation-rewards#113 (comment)
Caution
This issue may be a duplicate of the following issues:
Caution
This issue may be a duplicate of the following issues:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: