From a381cb2a4b30a6c8033fd91a40d91ee4a6e71374 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dmos62 <2715476+dmos62@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 19:11:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix forgotten break in switch statement #2

Without the break statement, the execution would continue through the subsequent case clauses until it encountered a break, executing `checkArgument` calls meant for `REIMBURSEMENT_MAX_AMOUNT`. More specifically, the bug would cause a failed check in the case where `inputValueAsCoin.value <= 200000000` is false.
---
 .../core/dao/governance/proposal/param/ChangeParamValidator.java | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/core/src/main/java/bisq/core/dao/governance/proposal/param/ChangeParamValidator.java b/core/src/main/java/bisq/core/dao/governance/proposal/param/ChangeParamValidator.java
index 41e4f320f72..87eb9882305 100644
--- a/core/src/main/java/bisq/core/dao/governance/proposal/param/ChangeParamValidator.java
+++ b/core/src/main/java/bisq/core/dao/governance/proposal/param/ChangeParamValidator.java
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ private void validateBsqValue(Coin currentParamValueAsCoin, Coin inputValueAsCoi
             case REIMBURSEMENT_MIN_AMOUNT:
                 checkArgument(inputValueAsCoin.value >= Restrictions.getMinNonDustOutput().value,
                         Res.get("validation.amountBelowDust", Restrictions.getMinNonDustOutput().value));
+                break;
             case COMPENSATION_REQUEST_MAX_AMOUNT:
             case REIMBURSEMENT_MAX_AMOUNT:
                 checkArgument(inputValueAsCoin.value >= Restrictions.getMinNonDustOutput().value,