Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

egg fragments resolution #194

Closed
itd opened this issue Nov 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

egg fragments resolution #194

itd opened this issue Nov 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@itd
Copy link

itd commented Nov 2, 2020

I'm getting errors when trying to install dogpile.cache

It seems similar to a PEP-517 packaging issue I found here:
pypa/packaging-problems#252 (comment)

Here's a snippet of the -vv output:

Collecting dogpile.cache==1.0.2
  Using cached dogpile.cache-1.0.2.tar.gz (351 kB)
  WARNING: Generating metadata for package dogpile.cache produced metadata for project name unknown. Fix your #egg=dogpile.cache fragments.
Requirement already satisfied (use --upgrade to upgrade): unknown from https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/53/05/f8445598250e0237aeaf0d82301f56ee5550b7d4d24dcdd44c7425c50497/dogpile.cache-1.0.2.tar.gz#sha256=64fda39d25b46486a4876417ca03a4af06f35bfadba9f59613f9b3d748aa21ef in ./venvstack/lib/python3.6/site-packages (from -r req.txt (line 15))

  Attempting uninstall: setuptools
    Found existing installation: setuptools 28.8.0
    Uninstalling setuptools-28.8.0:
      Successfully uninstalled setuptools-28.8.0
ERROR: After October 2020 you may experience errors when installing or updating packages. This is because pip will change the way that it resolves dependency conflicts.

We recommend you use --use-feature=2020-resolver to test your packages with the new resolver before it becomes the default.

openstacksdk 0.48.0 requires dogpile.cache>=0.6.5, which is not installed.
python-ironicclient 4.2.0 requires dogpile.cache>=0.6.2, which is not installed.```

@zzzeek zzzeek added the question Further information is requested label Nov 2, 2020
@zzzeek
Copy link
Member

zzzeek commented Nov 2, 2020

hi there -

In #178 we made sure we are not doing anything even slightly non-standard in response to upstream/downstream issues. I have no insight on this issue and I am not familiar with any source code in dogpile.cache itself which can cause problems with installation, so I would recommend reaching out to the pypa community to get help from this issue. We can make further adjustments as they are able to recommend.

@itd
Copy link
Author

itd commented Nov 2, 2020

I just tried it on 4 other systems os/distro combinations and could not reproduce this issue, so it has to be an issue local to a specific installation/problem on one of my servers. Thanks for the quick feedback!

@itd itd closed this as completed Nov 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants