You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It will help provide some cover traffic for off-chain protocols like Lightning. If we pull this off we could end up in a great situation where LN channel openings and closings look exactly the same as on-chain taproot transactions. That would be great for the privacy and fungibility of bitcoin.
I'll note that currently the pseudocode will not only disable absolute locktime, but disable or enable RBF depending on whether the absolute locktime is set. I believe it would be better to use
input.nsequence = 2**32 - 3
which would leave locktime and RBF enabled in all cases. The absolute locktime can be set to zero when relative locktime is used.
I saw on twitter that Sparrow has already implemented taproot single-sig wallets.
Please consider adding privacy-improving code which I suggested on the mailing list: https://gist.github.com/chris-belcher/903feab321bf41055c91eaec46581e89
It will help provide some cover traffic for off-chain protocols like Lightning. If we pull this off we could end up in a great situation where LN channel openings and closings look exactly the same as on-chain taproot transactions. That would be great for the privacy and fungibility of bitcoin.
The BIP proposal contains some pseudocode which hopefully you can just copypaste and translate into your language: https://gist.github.com/chris-belcher/903feab321bf41055c91eaec46581e89#pseudocode
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: