Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 1.8 #376

Closed
kornelski opened this issue Jul 12, 2014 · 10 comments
Closed

Release 1.8 #376

kornelski opened this issue Jul 12, 2014 · 10 comments

Comments

@kornelski
Copy link
Member

Is there any outstanding development blocking release?

Also, shall we do betas?

@jakepetroules
Copy link
Contributor

I think a beta would be a good idea especially since there's been some bigger changes recently (GC > ARC). Do we want the Yahoo! sandboxing support in for 1.8?

@fernandomorgan
Copy link

If you need it, I can help in porting the sandbox code - done it twice already, so I can do it a third, and now that it was published, I am free to do it.

for the actual update download, I have been using NSURLConnection, and I much prefer the extra versatility (like being able to resume a download).

Also, in the peer_event_handler in main.m (sandbox_service), during copy maybe it's possible to add other validations? forcing the same app ID maybe?

also, I am looking at adding this flag kSecCSCheckNestedCode to the code signing check (SUCodeSigningVerifier.m)

but this might break apps signed in 10.8 or earlier, before Mavericks code signing changes.

F

On Saturday, July 12, 2014 1:45 PM, Jake Petroules [email protected] wrote:

I think a beta would be a good idea especially since there's been some bigger changes recently (GC > ARC). Do we want the Yahoo! sandboxing support in for 1.8?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@kornelski
Copy link
Member Author

I'd release what we have (ARC + new DSA validation), as that's big enough step already. Release sandbox next?

@jakepetroules
Copy link
Contributor

OK, let's target sandboxing for 1.9 then.

@kornelski
Copy link
Member Author

OK, so I think the only blocking thing is now a test for the new DSA code.

@grouchal
Copy link

I am very keen to see the sandboxing work included in a stable release of Sparkle, but from this thread it seems that it will be a while.

To plan for our project can you give any indication of when 1.9 might be released? Is this likely in the next month or two?

I guess the key for that would be when will 1.8 be released, the beta and final? If I read correctly the only thing holding back the 1.8 beta is the DSA Test - is this correct?

Is there anything I can do to assist in completing the 1.8 release so that work can begin in earnest on the 1.9 release?

@kornelski
Copy link
Member Author

@grouchal I see you've found issues with the xpc branch. You can already make a pull request to fix those. Just add it on the yahooxpc branch (and when you make the the PR select sparkle-project/yahooxpc branch as the destination).

@grouchal
Copy link

@pornel OK I've created a pull request for the changes on the yahooxpc branch - anything else I can do to help speed things along?

@kornelski
Copy link
Member Author

I've added the test for the DSA verifier (e11f838). :shipit:

@kornelski
Copy link
Member Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants