Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Level 3 Error for Pure Parallel NIRCam WFSS with NGROUPS=1 #8959

Open
stscijgbot-jp opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Level 3 Error for Pure Parallel NIRCam WFSS with NGROUPS=1 #8959

stscijgbot-jp opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@stscijgbot-jp
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue JP-3801 was created on JIRA by Tyler Pauly:

During operations processing of new data in jw05398, a pure parallel WFSS program, errors were returned during Level 3 processing of o025, a direct image component of the program observed with the setting NGROUPS=1.

The NIRCam team looked into it and reported that data taken with NGROUPS=1 can be subject to poor calibration; the data in question appear to have large bias residuals remaining during level 3 image processing, resulting in the outlier_detection step flagging all pixels as NaN/DO_NOT_USE.

@stscijgbot-jp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Comment by Tyler Pauly on JIRA:

Link to relevant slack discussion: https://stsci.slack.com/archives/C9KF4MVEV/p1731071916799629

@stscijgbot-jp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Comment by Alicia Canipe on JIRA:

Just an update: we're trying to figure out why NGROUPS=1 didn't work for the PID 5398 observations when it did seem to work for other programs that have used NGROUPS=1: 

  • PID 1058 obs 105, 106, 297
  • PID 1409 obs 132
  • PID 2560 obs 17
  • PID 6078 obs 1

@stscijgbot-jp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Comment by Alicia Canipe on JIRA:

Tyler Pauly was obs 25 of 5398 the only one that had issues? Obs 27, 28, 25, 26 also all have NGROUPS=1 and the strange pattern, but it sounds like they made it though stage 3 okay? 

@stscijgbot-jp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Comment by Tyler Pauly on JIRA:

Obs 25 was the reported error from Ops, but I pulled o028 from MAST and tried image3, which failed for both LW and SW data. I'm guessing that 26 and 27 were not attempted because the direct image level 3 products were not generated.

@stscijgbot-jp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Comment by Alicia Canipe on JIRA:

Okay thanks! That helps 

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant