Replies: 1 comment
-
Sounds good, thanks for the PR (#277). This will be in a near future release. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Based on our experience, particularly with large packages, we've found it beneficial to use a custom timeout instead of the default one, due to instances where a timeout is necessary. In our Github workflow implementation, we categorize packages as either
big
orsmall
. For larger packages, we could initially set a fixed timeout based on current test times, but this becomes problematic as the package evolves. As new features are added, test times are likely to extend, potentially leading to premature timeout terminations. To counter this, we're considering implementing a dynamic scaling factor, such as1.2x
or1.5x
the base test time. This approach ensures that as the test duration increases with additional features, the allowable time before a timeout also increases proportionally. I'm currently working on integrating this feature and will submit a pull request soon.If you have any specific recommendations or insights on this matter, please feel free to share them.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions