[kubernetes] Add support for k8s snap

[arif-ali]

Also, fix command for microk8s, and use variable

---

Please place an 'X' inside each '[]' to confirm you adhere to our Contributor Guidelines

• Is the commit message split over multiple lines and hard-wrapped at 72 characters?
• Is the subject and message clear and concise?
• Does the subject start with [plugin_name] if submitting a plugin patch or a [section_name] if part of the core sosreport code?
• Does the commit contain a Signed-off-by: First Lastname [email protected]?
• Are any related Issues or existing PRs properly referenced via a Closes (Issue) or Resolved (PR) line?
• Are all passwords or private data gathered by this PR obfuscated?

[packit-as-a-service]

Congratulations! One of the builds has completed. 🍾

You can install the built RPMs by following these steps:

• sudo yum install -y dnf-plugins-core on RHEL 8
• sudo dnf install -y dnf-plugins-core on Fedora
• dnf copr enable packit/sosreport-sos-3842
• And now you can install the packages.

Please note that the RPMs should be used only in a testing environment.

[pmoravec]

The yaml files cant contain any credentials worth to postproc, right?

[arif-ali]

I have gone through these files maually twice :), and there isn't anything to obfuscate, except for /var/snap/k8s/common/var/lib/k8sd/state/truststore/k8s.yaml, which I've already added in postproc()

I am now getting all of this verified by our k8s SMEs to ensure we got everything

[TurboTurtle]

Plugin looks fine. My only concern is around naming. We have kubernetes as well as microk8s already today. k8s is a well-known shorthand for kubernetes, so it may start being a little opaque what plugin collects what for "$defacto_standard_container_orchestration_platform"

[arif-ali]

Plugin looks fine. My only concern is around naming. We have kubernetes as well as microk8s already today. k8s is a well-known shorthand for kubernetes, so it may start being a little opaque what plugin collects what for "$defacto_standard_container_orchestration_platform"

Happy to change it to canonical_k8s if that would be better, or rather we just add the relevant tests and collect in the kubernetes plugin.

I'm not precious in any way, as long as we collect the info, which is the main ethos here

[arif-ali]

I've moved it now to the kubernetes.py plugin, hopefully that makes much more sense. Always good to think outside of the box, and this does make better sense.

This also made me realise that we were collecting a folder, and obfuscating the said folder. So, actually needed less code adding.

Maybe we can also move the microk8s here, and have everything under the one umbrella, I'll leave that thought here, and see what others think