-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: Easier installation with yad bundled #373
Comments
short answer: Sorry, no. Not my job. long answer: It is generally not the job of development upstream to provide packages for any distribution. Users who use one specific distro which is lacking any package they are interested in should either provide a package themselves or try to encourage a package maintainer to do so. Of course anybody who is willing to contribute to the project by providing packages for their distribution is still welcome. I'll leave this open for a while for general discussion, hoping it attracts someone willing to help. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
someone pointed out on discord that the 3rd part appimage has undefined symbols, which I could reproduce. reopening, as I'm curious if people are actually willing to help keeping this updated |
I would be interested in attempting it. |
Thanks for the kind offer, @TaliesinEmrys. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Indeed it is not complicated. you know that appimage above is a working workaround already for using yad on your yad-free distribution, right? |
Hallo frostworx. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hallo @TaliesinEmrys :)
Good luck so far! :) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I'm a bit late to the issue, but I have merged the changes of frostworx |
Thanks, @kadogo! 👍 |
Welcome @frostworx ^^ I also updated the AppImage, but I still build it against Debian stretch, so let me know if I need to build it against buster or to have multiple releases. If there is maybe a "command" for testing the AppImage I can test it too |
Good to see you're still here, @kadogo :)
What do you think? |
I think it's a good idea, it will let people only change the "path" for yad or instead download the binary that you provide or from another source. It's best to wait, the thought of other peoples, but I only see benefit for these features ^^ |
Snippet from the upcoming AppImageThe
|
I just pushed the new options with this commit |
hey @TaliesinEmrys, did you have success? |
Yes I did thankyou it worked successfully. |
Great to hear! |
Seems like this can be closed... |
Is it possible for you, to make the installation on Ubuntu and derivates easier?
My son was interested in stl but he was driven away by the uneasy yad installation. Shouldn't it be possible, to just have a binary version of yad that comes with steamtinkerlaunch?
So that one can just do "sudo make install" on Ubuntu and derivates too? All the other dependencies are easy to install and mostly installed anyways.
Steamtinkerlaunch seems to be really a great tool and thanks for sharing your work with others for free. I think it could be more widely used, if it was easier to install (I know, it is easy when the aur is available).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: