Inner instruction reporting is confusing because they are collapsed within outer instructions

[jackcmay]

Problem

A list of inner instructions is reported for each outer instruction within a transaction. This list only contains the instructions called but does not contain any information about who called them. This can be confusing because consumers have no direct way to distinguish between the two following cases:

A -> B -> C

and

A -> B, A -> C

Where A is the outer instruction and B and C are inners.

Information is available in the transaction log messages that could be parsed to determine this but that is far from ideal.

Proposed Solution

The inner-instruction list could contain associated stack depths for each inner instruction.