You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are at least 4 categories of supply which have materially different economic and risk significance, and should be partitioned in the UI for clarity:
Circulating
These tokens are free to transfer.
Circulating Withheld
These tokens were collected from transfer fees and are not circulating but might eventually be because the Withdraw Authority is not Null.
Permalocked
These tokens were either collected as transfer fees with Null as Withdraw Authority, or were sent to
1nc1nerator11111111111111111111111111111111
In either case, if they're LP tokens, they still own a share in LP fees.
Burned
These tokens were destroyed using a Burn instruction. If these are LP tokens, the corresponding ownership share of the LP no longer exists. Major difference with #3.
Example Links
Here's an LP token that was used with the former TAPIR mint address:
B92UoeqcQZysFHmVz6bPjCLbFMH8gnYH2iqWf8Piou2j
As you can see, the supply is over 10M. But the 10M was sent to the incinerator (but not burned) long ago:
Now, that 10M isn't fully burned because it still represents an ownership share in the LP (and thus prevents other holders from usurping the entire pool). However, it's also not circulating in the sense that it would allow us to withdraw liquidity. A distinction should be made in the UI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
tapirtoken
changed the title
Distinction should be made between circulating, permalocked, withheld, and burned supply
Distinction should be made between circulating, circulating withheld, permalocked, and burned supply
Jul 19, 2024
Describe the bug
With reference to the existing supply display bug:
#324
There are at least 4 categories of supply which have materially different economic and risk significance, and should be partitioned in the UI for clarity:
These tokens are free to transfer.
These tokens were collected from transfer fees and are not circulating but might eventually be because the Withdraw Authority is not Null.
These tokens were either collected as transfer fees with Null as Withdraw Authority, or were sent to
1nc1nerator11111111111111111111111111111111
In either case, if they're LP tokens, they still own a share in LP fees.
These tokens were destroyed using a Burn instruction. If these are LP tokens, the corresponding ownership share of the LP no longer exists. Major difference with #3.
Example Links
Here's an LP token that was used with the former TAPIR mint address:
B92UoeqcQZysFHmVz6bPjCLbFMH8gnYH2iqWf8Piou2j
As you can see, the supply is over 10M. But the 10M was sent to the incinerator (but not burned) long ago:
4vdhsQZPtRdwWyTcCdMLdr94fTMzjvtwtqMSzYqFDF3QZqS8bubj1FnW3JrxL9y418yxKmU8uvrjM4uEstsWiEm2
Now, that 10M isn't fully burned because it still represents an ownership share in the LP (and thus prevents other holders from usurping the entire pool). However, it's also not circulating in the sense that it would allow us to withdraw liquidity. A distinction should be made in the UI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: