-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Success axios interceptors fired multiple times #246
Comments
Since multiple axios interceptors can be registered, it seems to me that the correct behavior is that each interceptor's processing is executed when implemented as shown in the test. cf. https://github.com/axios/axios#multiple-interceptors |
@yutak23 Not sure I get your point. When I use axios with my own interceptors and eventually need to add "retry" logic, I expect to add this "retry" logic with no effect on my own old interceptor part. I want still to execute old interceptors as before - only once, not cascading as in the provided example: original call: Each time library copy my custom interceptor which results of unnecessary calling (=failed retry times) once the latest retry succeeds. If my custom interceptor transforms the response, then I gonna receive "..read the property of undefined..". Could you confirm it's expected behavior? And if so, how then I should use my transform interceptor if I wanna add Thanks for your time 🙂 |
I'm joining @lavagri request. I expect my interceptor to run only once when Is it possible to apply the described behavior with the current library implementation? |
I have the same issue as @lavagri described. Seems like I have to decide what to use either my custom interceptors or axios-retry interceptor only. For me, it looks like a hidden side-effect. There is no sense in calling all interceptors multiplied by the amount of retries. I'm expecting that "axios-retry" will prevent calls to the next interceptor until it is rejected/resolved and only then it will call the next interceptor in the chain once (not multiple times) like it is described in axios docs. It would be nice to see a config option to control such things without implementing a possible breaking change. |
As @yutak23 mentioned, this is the expected behaviour in axios (as retries are actually new requests). |
Another thing to note is that when the interceptors transform the request / response, for example: api.interceptors.request.use(config => {
if (config.data) {
config.data['some-request-sign-stuff'] = sign(config.data);
config.data = stringify(config.data);
config.headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded';
}
return config;
});
api.interceptors.response.use(response => {
// The response looks like {"code": 200, "message": "OK", "data": "your-real-data-here"} because it's wrapped in some gateway stuff
const data = response.data;
if (data.code) {
if (data.code !== 200) {
throw new ApiError(data.code, data.message);
}
response.data = data.data;
} else {
throw new Error('Unrecognized API response: ' + JSON.stringify(data));
}
return response;
}); The retry logic will break these inteceptors, resulting in either "trying to create I'm currently just using an ugly hack to "fix" this, hope there's an "official" way to fix it (at least for the response part): api.interceptors.request.use(config => {
const rAny = config as any;
if (rAny._processed_by_our_library) {
return config;
}
rAny._processed_by_our_library = true;
// ... other stuff
}); The problem here is, an interceptor is expected to be called ONCE per request call, or at least per response / per request, instead of being called multiple times on the same response (well, multiple calls on the same request object makes sense). Currently the library causes it to be called 1+N times on the same request / response object when there're N retries. |
What's weird about this is that the response interceptor is called X times (the number of retries), but always with the same object, as if I'm using a request and a response interceptor to log the status code and the time the request took, and all printed lines contain the same information. This doesn't feel like expected behavior, as I would at least expect the first responses to be failed requests. |
Hello, since the PR has not been merged, I thought someone might find this workaround useful. It resolved the issue in my case. The idea is to provide axios-retry with a different Axios client than the one used by other interceptors. This way we can isolate axios-retry from other interceptors and prevent it from triggering them multiple times. This ensures that other interceptors don’t see the "N effect" in case of retries. example:
RetryInterceptor.ts
The |
Recently we up our
axios-retry
lib version and still applied our patch to fix this bug 😅So I decided to quickly share it, maybe someone wants to implement it in future version and just reuse our patch for that.
So here is almost full jest test we have for checking desired behavior:
And here is our dirty patch (for CJS, if you're using ESM, consider just patch esm file same way):
Maybe we just do not use this library in the proper way 🙃
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: