Expose CodegenWriter's doc writer #1083
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When the doc writer is just an anonymous lambda function, it makes sense to hide it away in the parent implementation. But when it's a class that satisifies the interface, there may be additional things on it that the subclasses or callers will want to use. For example, a doc formatter.
mtdowling
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When the doc writer is just an anonymous lambda function, it makes sense
to hide it away in the parent implementation. But when it's a class that
satisifies the interface, there may be additional things on it that the
subclasses or callers will want to use. For example, a doc formatter.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.