Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add design doc for configuring SDK client for the orchestrator #2527
Add design doc for configuring SDK client for the orchestrator #2527
Changes from all commits
b3ab553
a2c6da3
d6ec752
2e459db
5f34ee0
1832432
d4ebf33
e4604b3
87f98ea
9a8c78e
0f6f941
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NIT - I don't think "as needed" is necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NIT - possible alternative wording:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NIT
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NIT - When listing things, I think we should actually use bulleted/numbered lists:
Also, I changed the wording here, please update things if I didn't communicate your intent accurately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NIT - possible alternative wording:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Within our team, we refer often to different "levels" of configuration. I'm worried we don't explain this way of looking at things to outsiders. Would you mind linking to a footnote that briefly names the different levels and how they relate to one another? If you don't want to write a footnote, we may have an RFC or something you can link to instead.
You already explain it a bit here. You could take what you have and expand it, but I think moving stuff into a footnote is better because the explanation will otherwise "slow things down" for readers that understand the layered config.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NIT - you could probably just call this:
or "The Implementation"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.