Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename make_token to idempotency_token_provider #2783

Merged

Conversation

ysaito1001
Copy link
Contributor

@ysaito1001 ysaito1001 commented Jun 16, 2023

Motivation and Context

Incorporates suggestion made in #2762 (comment)

Description

This PR renames make_token to idempotency_token_provider for clarity wherever it is referred to in the fields and API in service configs and their builders.

Testing

Existing tests in CI

Checklist

  • I have updated CHANGELOG.next.toml if I made changes to the smithy-rs codegen or runtime crates
  • I have updated CHANGELOG.next.toml if I made changes to the AWS SDK, generated SDK code, or SDK runtime crates

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@ysaito1001 ysaito1001 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 16, 2023 00:19
@ysaito1001 ysaito1001 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 16, 2023 00:20
@ysaito1001 ysaito1001 added breaking-change This will require a breaking change needs-sdk-review labels Jun 16, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

A new generated diff is ready to view.

A new doc preview is ready to view.

@ysaito1001 ysaito1001 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 16, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9630892 Jun 16, 2023
@ysaito1001 ysaito1001 deleted the ysaito/rename-make-token-in-idempotency-token-provider branch June 16, 2023 18:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking-change This will require a breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants