Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The voter does not react to squelch open in some cases #5

Closed
sm0svx opened this issue Jun 29, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

The voter does not react to squelch open in some cases #5

sm0svx opened this issue Jun 29, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@sm0svx
Copy link
Owner

sm0svx commented Jun 29, 2014

Reported by sm0svx on 29 Sep 2009 22:15 UTC
I've played a bit with the voter configuration and found out a problem that occurs sometimes. My configuration (at the moment) is a svxlink-base and one remotetrx. The remotetrx is the relay-station with RX and TX and the base has only a RX (I have my reasons why I have done it in this way ;-). I've running the version 1681.

Here are some log entries:

remote-TRX:

Tue Sep 22 19:14:31 2009: Voter: The squelch is OPEN (QuantarRx=107.506)
Tue Sep 22 19:14:36 2009: Voter: The squelch is CLOSED (QuantarRx=4.09622)
Tue Sep 22 19:14:38 2009: Voter: The squelch is OPEN (QuantarRx=74.4778)
Tue Sep 22 19:14:51 2009: Voter: The squelch is CLOSED (QuantarRx=-4.20453)
Tue Sep 22 19:14:53 2009: Voter: The squelch is OPEN (QuantarRx=97.0731)
Tue Sep 22 19:14:53 2009: Voter: Mute(true)
Tue Sep 22 19:15:20 2009: Voter: Mute(false)
Tue Sep 22 19:15:22 2009: Voter: The squelch is OPEN (QuantarRx=75.9478)
Tue Sep 22 19:15:46 2009: QuantarTx: Turning the transmitter OFF

The last two lines show that a strong signal is being received but it isn't detect by the svxlink base. It happens often, if a strong signal is received by the base first and a weaker signal later by the remotetrx.

svxlink-base:

Tue Sep 22 19:14:38 2009: Voter: The squelch is OPEN (QuantarRx=73.2107)                     
Tue Sep 22 19:14:52 2009: Voter::satSquelchOpen(FALSE, QuantarRx): Signal Strength = -4.20453
Tue Sep 22 19:14:52 2009: Voter: The squelch is CLOSED (QuantarRx=-4.20453)                  
Tue Sep 22 19:14:53 2009: Voter::satSquelchOpen(TRUE, OeblesRx1): Signal Strength = 98.9846  
Tue Sep 22 19:14:53 2009: Voter::satSquelchOpen(TRUE, QuantarRx): Signal Strength = 90.1575  
Tue Sep 22 19:14:53 2009: Voter::chooseBestRx                                                
Tue Sep 22 19:14:53 2009: Voter::satSquelchOpen(FALSE, QuantarRx): Signal Strength = 0       
Tue Sep 22 19:14:53 2009: Voter: The squelch is OPEN (OeblesRx1=98.9846)                     
Tue Sep 22 19:15:20 2009: Voter::satSquelchOpen(FALSE, OeblesRx1): Signal Strength = -0.0725002
Tue Sep 22 19:15:20 2009: Voter: The squelch is CLOSED (OeblesRx1=-0.0725002)                  
Tue Sep 22 19:15:45 2009: Deactivating all links to/from "RepeaterLogic"                       
Tue Sep 22 19:15:46 2009: QuantarTx: The transmitter is OFF                                    
@sm0svx sm0svx self-assigned this Jun 29, 2014
@sm0svx sm0svx closed this as completed Jun 29, 2014
@sm0svx
Copy link
Owner Author

sm0svx commented Jun 29, 2014

Commented by sm3sgp on 17 Jan 2010 12:28 UTC
The same problem showed when configuring a system with two remote RX and one local RX.

  1. If ALL RX Squelches opens, the Voter selects the strongest one.
  2. Next time, ALL RX Squelches OPENs, same RX is chosen.
  3. ALL RX SQL opens again, same RX opens.
  4. ONLY one Squelch from another RX opens, nothing happens in svxlink (shows ok in remotetrx).
  5. If the last chosen (and working RX) opens ONLY, one time, the fault is "reset".

It should be possible to reproduce easy, but maybe not to fix... ;-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant