You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Referring to literature Sayer et al, 2010 , slope calculation equation can be expressed as:
In equation above, $\phi$ is not $\phi_r$ , which represents Relative azimuth angle. But in our Codes below, $\phi$ was replaced by $\phi_r$.
No offence, I'm just excited about any mistakes I might find. I apologise if I have offended you.
Back to the question. I think $\phi$ should be the azimuth of the normal vector of the slope. Because if you don't consider it that way, then the calculated specular reflection has nothing to do with the undulation of the sea.
Referring to literature Sayer et al, 2010 , slope calculation equation can be expressed as:
$\phi$ is not $\phi_r$ , which represents Relative azimuth angle. But in our Codes below, $\phi$ was replaced by $\phi_r$ .
In equation above,
Why are we doing this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: