Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
35 lines (34 loc) · 1.47 KB

meeting_with_infra_notes.md

File metadata and controls

35 lines (34 loc) · 1.47 KB

Meeting, Wednesday September 9, 2023

  • Participants:
    • Sam Grayson
    • Tren Hao
    • Nathan Somers
    • Jake Levine
  • What names should we settle on?
    • GLUG/Infra cluster
  • Purpose and offerings of the other cluster and of our cluster?
    • HPC cluster: batch execution for SIG{AIDA, Ecom, HPC}
      • SIGAIDA also has fleshed out requirements, but could be computationally intensive
        • NCSA compute cluster may be a better option
    • Container execution cluster: general purpose, SIGPWNY, SIGAIDA, ACM Infra, ACM Projects
      • SIGPWNY has the most fleshed out requirements
      • ACM Projects Committee Saurav & Max leads
      • For our cluster: offer container engine, maybe VM space. We don't have many nodes and only 1 GPU.
  • What IPAM network for each of us to use?
    • Could use same
  • What level of collaboration going forward?
    • Get requirements documents from other SIGs, especially SIGAIDA and SIGPWNY
    • Raw k8s access could be acceptable user interface/service offeirng
  • Next steps:
    • GLUG/Infra cluster team:
      • What we want to do
        • Revise task list
          • Emphasize doing container engine first
      • How we're going to do it
        • Make them all have the same distro
        • Find candidate HTTP/HTTPS service, ask Engr IT to open external port for that service
        • Deploy persistent storage for k8s
        • Deploy k8s
    • Jake:
      • Send us requirements docuemnts from SIGAIDA, SIGPWNY, Infra, Applications, others...
      • forward infra-compute applications over