- Participants:
- Sam Grayson
- Tren Hao
- Nathan Somers
- Jake Levine
- What names should we settle on?
- GLUG/Infra cluster
- Purpose and offerings of the other cluster and of our cluster?
- HPC cluster: batch execution for SIG{AIDA, Ecom, HPC}
- SIGAIDA also has fleshed out requirements, but could be computationally intensive
- NCSA compute cluster may be a better option
- SIGAIDA also has fleshed out requirements, but could be computationally intensive
- Container execution cluster: general purpose, SIGPWNY, SIGAIDA, ACM Infra, ACM Projects
- SIGPWNY has the most fleshed out requirements
- ACM Projects Committee Saurav & Max leads
- For our cluster: offer container engine, maybe VM space. We don't have many nodes and only 1 GPU.
- HPC cluster: batch execution for SIG{AIDA, Ecom, HPC}
- What IPAM network for each of us to use?
- Could use same
- What level of collaboration going forward?
- Get requirements documents from other SIGs, especially SIGAIDA and SIGPWNY
- Raw k8s access could be acceptable user interface/service offeirng
- Next steps:
- GLUG/Infra cluster team:
- What we want to do
- Revise task list
- Emphasize doing container engine first
- Revise task list
- How we're going to do it
- Make them all have the same distro
- Find candidate HTTP/HTTPS service, ask Engr IT to open external port for that service
- Deploy persistent storage for k8s
- Deploy k8s
- What we want to do
- Jake:
- Send us requirements docuemnts from SIGAIDA, SIGPWNY, Infra, Applications, others...
- forward infra-compute applications over
- GLUG/Infra cluster team: