The kludgy syntax (superseded in v2.1.1.0) for the GLC command line options #14
shriprem
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
[ NOTE: The topic of this discussion was only relevant for the very much short-lived v2.1.0.0 Release. It has been rendered moot by the Consolidated GLC Command Line Options introduced in the v2.1.1.0 Release. ]
Reasons for the kludgy syntax (superseded in v2.1.1.0) for the
-GLCx
optionsOn the Notepad++ - Usage via the command prompt page, the multiple plural words in the description for the
-z
option lead you to think that a single-z
is sufficient for the multiple plugin-specific options that follow it.The GotoLineCol plugin is able to scan and handle the
-GLC
options just fine without the-z
option preceding each one of them. But the issue is with Notepad++; a bug probably. It considers any-GLC
options lacking an immediately preceding-z
as a filename and prompts whether to create a file with that name.I did try merging the
-z
and-GLCx
pairs into, say, the-zLCx
format. The plugin was able to scan and handle the options just fine. But the issue was with Notepad++. It considered the-zLCx
as a filename and prompted whether to create a file with that name.I opted to precede each of GotoLineCol's command line options with the
GLC
prefix to avoid any conflicts with other plugins using single-lettered command line options. I am aware that there aren't that many NPP plugins that use command line options. But still.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions