Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 12, 2023. It is now read-only.

0xGoodess - ChainlinkExpandAdaptor does not check whether L2 sequencer is up #9

Closed
sherlock-admin opened this issue May 10, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
Non-Reward This issue will not receive a payout

Comments

@sherlock-admin
Copy link
Contributor

sherlock-admin commented May 10, 2023

0xGoodess

medium

ChainlinkExpandAdaptor does not check whether L2 sequencer is up

Summary

ChainlinkExpandAdaptor does not check whether L2 sequencer is up.

Vulnerability Detail

Since Arbitrium has its own sequencer; block.timestamp only reflects the L1 timestamp on ethereum. It's possible that block.timestamp is delayed since Arbitrium only finalized on L1 every 40mins, potentially using old price from pricefeed in oracle.

Impact

Using old price from pricefeed in oracle due to unchecked timestamp difference esp when sequencer is down.

Code Snippet

https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-04-jojo/blob/main/smart-contract-EVM/contracts/adaptor/chainlinkAdaptor.sol#L49

Tool used

Manual Review

Recommendation

Use sequencer uptime check by using a chainlink oracle

https://docs.chain.link/data-feeds/l2-sequencer-feeds#handling-arbitrum-outages

Duplicate of #101

@github-actions github-actions bot added Medium A valid Medium severity issue Duplicate A valid issue that is a duplicate of an issue with `Has Duplicates` label labels May 17, 2023
@sherlock-admin sherlock-admin added the Reward A payout will be made for this issue label May 30, 2023
@sherlock-admin sherlock-admin added Non-Reward This issue will not receive a payout and removed Medium A valid Medium severity issue Duplicate A valid issue that is a duplicate of an issue with `Has Duplicates` label Reward A payout will be made for this issue labels Jun 19, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Non-Reward This issue will not receive a payout
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant