Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

about crypto library #637

Closed
rogers0 opened this issue May 17, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

about crypto library #637

rogers0 opened this issue May 17, 2016 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@rogers0
Copy link

rogers0 commented May 17, 2016

README.md mentioned that:
There are three crypto libraries available:
OpenSSL (default)
PolarSSL
mbedTLS (NOT officially supported)
But accroding to the mbedTLS homepage [0], it was called PolarSSL.
So the doc seems to be quite old. Please update what the status is currently. Thank you!

[0] https://tls.mbed.org/

@hosiet
Copy link

hosiet commented May 17, 2016

Different package name in distributions and header files has prevented from smooth migration between polarssl and mbedtls. Also, there are various regressions. The full switch may need more tests and wait till polarssl fade out from linux distributions.

Also see #422 and #365.

@wongsyrone
Copy link

mbed TLS here means the library which version higher than v2.0.0.

@madeye
Copy link

madeye commented May 17, 2016

As mentioned above, PolarSSL is still supported for compatibility.

@madeye madeye closed this as completed May 17, 2016
@rogers0
Copy link
Author

rogers0 commented May 17, 2016

Thanks for the comments!

I think these info should be added into README.md

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants