Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use Tree Adjoining Grammar derivations #10

Open
anoopsarkar opened this issue Apr 2, 2014 · 3 comments
Open

use Tree Adjoining Grammar derivations #10

anoopsarkar opened this issue Apr 2, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@anoopsarkar
Copy link
Member

add TAG elementary trees (etrees) in the edge features and also implement the method for building the derived tree described in the Carreras et al paper.

@anoopsarkar anoopsarkar added this to the augment parser milestone Apr 2, 2014
@yulanh
Copy link
Contributor

yulanh commented Jun 12, 2014

Waiting for the data.

@anoopsarkar
Copy link
Member Author

Let us start by using this data:

Note that this treebank does not obey the property used in the glm-parser paper. I will think about how to deal with that issue, but I think we can get started using this data. The first step will be to map this LTAG spinal treebank format into the conll format.

@anoopsarkar
Copy link
Member Author

we now have a way to generate the LTAG spinal training data directly from the dependency trees and the Penn Treebank phrase structure files. however, we are waiting for cube pruning to be implemented to add the LTAG features into the parser.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants