Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider taking on @types? #97

Closed
unional opened this issue May 17, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider taking on @types? #97

unional opened this issue May 17, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@unional
Copy link

unional commented May 17, 2017

Since redirect does not seem to be happening anytime soon, will you consider moving to use @types and remove typings?

I'm currently trying to do a wrapper on popsicle to add in addition code needed for our product. That means I have to either re-export popsicle typings (i.e. need to use typings in that library and the consumer of that library) or replicate the typings I needed.

If you think we should still wait for redirect, I'm fine with that too, and will just do the second way instead.

@blakeembrey
Copy link
Member

blakeembrey commented May 18, 2017

Sure, I could do that. I think the biggest blocker when I looked was that the types literally didn't exist in DefinitelyTyped or were wrong. There's also the issue of microsoft/TypeScript#7753, but it might just have to be something I deal with (the types will be incorrect somewhat in the browser).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants