Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing SplunkViaTcp and SplunkViaUdp functionality in .NET Core package version #65

Closed
sshows-clgx opened this issue Aug 11, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@sshows-clgx
Copy link

Noticed the .NET Core package is missing the extensions to the SplunkViaTcp and SplunkViaUdp functionality. Are there any plans for that to be added?

@merbla
Copy link
Contributor

merbla commented Aug 11, 2017

Hi @Sshows,
Thanks for dropping by. Initially the .Net Core (first versions) did not have libraries/APIs in place to support some of the protocols.

Now that Dot Net Core 2.0 is out, this could be a possibility.

Generally, we have had more requirements/requests around the HEC endpoint however if TCP/UDP is still in demand then it is something we should look into.

HTH

@Caldas
Copy link

Caldas commented Dec 27, 2017

Hi, any idea when TCP and UDP will be avaiable?

@merbla merbla modified the milestones: 2.5, 2.6 Jan 23, 2018
@andiexer
Copy link

would love to see udp support as well. maybe try to implement it by myself.

@merbla
Copy link
Contributor

merbla commented Mar 7, 2018

Currently in net45 TCP/UDP is implemented via Splunk.Logging.Common. This package does not currently target .Net Core (netstandard1/2).

Details at

Options are to drop the package and implement or wait for an update.

Thoughts?

@vstribrny
Copy link

It's sad that guys from Spulk are not willing to upgrade from netfw to netcore/netstandard. For version 2 onwards, it should not be a problem I believe.

@vstribrny
Copy link

I would personally remove that dependency and reimplement...

@merbla
Copy link
Contributor

merbla commented Nov 7, 2021

Closing as a part of larger Serilog contrib reorg

Checkout serilog/serilog#1627

@merbla merbla closed this as completed Nov 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants