Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"rngfilt" and "azifilt" suffix #68

Open
natasnat opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

"rngfilt" and "azifilt" suffix #68

natasnat opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@natasnat
Copy link

Hi, my workflow doesn't work when I use azimuth and range filters (I want to try hamming weighting, see my graph):

Hamming_Snap2StaMPS_Workflow problem_bennung

If I do exactly the same, but without the azimuth and range filters, I have no problems.

I have already tried not to do it as a graph, but step by step, but still the input is not accepted for the interferogram after applying the azimuth and range filters. I think it has something to do with the fact that after applying the filters the bands are renamed as shown in my screenshot with the suffix "_azifilt_rngfilt". My screenshot shows how the bands look before Enhanced-Spectral-Diversity (no problem with interferogram input) and after Enhanced-Spectral-Diversity with Azimuth-Range-Filter (not accepted as interferogram input).

I have checked the code in github and it is defined:

private static final String PRODUCT_NAME = "azimuth_filter";
private static final String PRODUCT_TAG = "azifilt";

private static final String PRODUCT_NAME = "range_filter";
private static final String PRODUCT_TAG = "rngfilt";

I think the interferogram input doesn’t know how to process the bands with the suffix “_azifilt_rngfilt”.

Is this really the problem and how can I fix it? Thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant