Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error while cargo check with since v4.0.0 #156

Closed
OlivierLemoine opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Error while cargo check with since v4.0.0 #156

OlivierLemoine opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@OlivierLemoine
Copy link

Hi, I'm using kiddo in my crate, but when I do cargo check or cargo test, I've got the error below.

I have tried with different version, and it appears that this error came with v.4.0.0.
I have also tried with default and no-default-features, and have been using KdTree with new, add and nearest_n exclusively.

Thanks

Error log:
   Compiling kiddo v4.2.0
error[E0107]: struct takes 2 lifetime arguments but 1 lifetime argument was supplied
  --> /root/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/kiddo-4.2.0/src/common/generate_within_unsorted_iter.rs:44:32
   |
44 |                   mut gen_scope: Scope<'a, (), NearestNeighbour<A, T>>,
   |                                  ^^^^^ -- supplied 1 lifetime argument
   |                                  |
   |                                  expected 2 lifetime arguments
   |
  ::: /root/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/kiddo-4.2.0/src/fixed/query/within_unsorted_iter.rs:18:5
   |
18 | /     generate_within_unsorted_iter!(
19 | |         (r#"Finds all elements within `dist` of `query`, using the specified
20 | | distance metric function.
21 | |
...  |
46 | | ```"#)
47 | |     );
   | |_____- in this macro invocation
   |
note: struct defined here, with 2 lifetime parameters: `'scope`, `'a`
  --> /root/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/generator-0.7.6/src/scope.rs:16:12
   |
16 | pub struct Scope<'scope, 'a, A, T> {
   |            ^^^^^ ------  --
   = note: this error originates in the macro `generate_within_unsorted_iter` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
help: add missing lifetime argument
   |
44 |                 mut gen_scope: Scope<'a, 'a, (), NearestNeighbour<A, T>>,
   |                                        ++++
error[E0107]: struct takes 2 lifetime arguments but 1 lifetime argument was supplied
  --> /root/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/kiddo-4.2.0/src/common/generate_within_unsorted_iter.rs:44:32
   |
44 |                   mut gen_scope: Scope<'a, (), NearestNeighbour<A, T>>,
   |                                  ^^^^^ -- supplied 1 lifetime argument
   |                                  |
   |                                  expected 2 lifetime arguments
   |
  ::: /root/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/kiddo-4.2.0/src/float/query/within_unsorted_iter.rs:43:5
   |
43 | /     generate_float_within_unsorted_iter!(
44 | |         "
45 | | let mut tree: KdTree<f64, 3> = KdTree::new();
46 | | tree.add(&[1.0, 2.0, 5.0], 100);
47 | | tree.add(&[2.0, 3.0, 6.0], 101);"
48 | |     );
   | |_____- in this macro invocation
   |
note: struct defined here, with 2 lifetime parameters: `'scope`, `'a`
  --> /root/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/generator-0.7.6/src/scope.rs:16:12
   |
16 | pub struct Scope<'scope, 'a, A, T> {
   |            ^^^^^ ------  --
   = note: this error originates in the macro `generate_within_unsorted_iter` which comes from the expansion of the macro `generate_float_within_unsorted_iter` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
help: add missing lifetime argument
   |
44 |                 mut gen_scope: Scope<'a, 'a, (), NearestNeighbour<A, T>>,
   |                                        ++++
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0107`.
error: could not compile `kiddo` (lib) due to 2 previous errors
@OlivierLemoine
Copy link
Author

OlivierLemoine commented Mar 1, 2024

Just seen that it was a duplicate of #154

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant