-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEATURE] LR_DECAY adjustment from 0.007 to 0.0045 seems to help model convergence #488
Comments
Neat. I'm potentially interested, but would want more data points. It would be nice to assemble a set of test cases. I assume this is a high-gain model? Orange is better, but it's still over 0.01. What happens when it's a clean model, or when there's a cab? etc |
Yes. It's a very hairy high gain model. |
This archive contains the reamps (all were done using the v3_0_0.wav), the resulting NAM models and the lightning_logs folder with all its contents: https://mega.nz/file/GhwwVbaJ#95_cYIMwLW4AeQN9lgXlG1VZ9YkDvpUqhPO1Ntw-XKs |
LR 0.004 and LR_DECAY 0.004 seems to be slightly less jagged and converges comparatively (ESR & time) to LR_DECAY 0.007 Anyway, this is a deep rabbit hole.. |
Absolutely agree that LR_decay better to be smaller than 0.007 But initial lr sometimes need to set lower value or loss will jump many times (jump from local minimum to worse place) |
Hey Steve,
Minor thing but it seems that using the LR_DECAY value of 0.0045 in the trainer benefits model convergence over the 0.007 value in the trainer by default.
I have been using this value for a few months now & its ESR slope is slightly better. If you feel this is a noteworthy improvement, maybe having it included in the next release?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: